Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erin Sweeny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:45, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Erin Sweeny

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. 2 of the 4 sources are primary. And there is no inherent notability from being in the 100 Women (BBC). Lacking WP:SIGCOV in third party sources. LibStar (talk) 01:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Psychology, and Australia. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mention (singular) in the BBC 100 Women article on the BBC site, but that's all there is. She appears to be an employed social worker, doing her job. Nothing else I can find to support having an article. Oaktree b (talk) 19:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG by the looks of it.-KH-1 (talk) 04:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.